Coulomb’s Constant
From discrete measure to electromagnetic coupling. In Measurement Quantization, MQ, Coulomb’s constant is expressed through fundamental measures and the geometry of Frames mapping. The construction proceeds through electromagnetic count, charge and vacuum permittivity.
The MQ expression
The symbol k subscript e denotes Coulomb’s constant in newton square metres per square coulomb. Epsilon subscript zero is vacuum permittivity in farads per metre. The fundamental mass m subscript f and length l subscript f have SI units kilograms and metres. The speed of light c is exactly 299792458 metres per second. Gamma subscript F,sys is the mapped electromagnetic charge-squared realization parameter, with units C squared.
MQKB522 equation MQ2234 supplies the mapped expression and MQ2228 defines gamma subscript F,sys = (1 C) squared times the dimensionless configuration coefficient gamma subscript F. The sys qualifier identifies its System Frame physical representation; it is not a second independently fitted parameter. The SI units of m_f l_f c squared divided by gamma_F,sys are kg m cubed s to the minus two C to the minus two, equivalently N m squared C to the minus two, as required. The vacuum-permittivity reduction follows MQ2031 and MQ2094.
Figure
A gold positive charge on the left and blue negative charge on the right are connected by curved field lines, with arrows directed from the positive charge toward the negative charge. The illustration depicts electrostatic coupling conceptually. It is not a computed field solution, measured field map or numerical statement about charge separation.
The MQ construction uses calibrated fundamental measures. Its electromagnetic identities share the stated count and calibration premises; internal algebraic agreement is not an independent experimental validation of the count construction. The infographic introduces no additional numerical prediction or uncertainty estimate.
A First Principles Description of Coulomb's Constant
Coulomb's constant is one of the fundamental constants of electromagnetism. In conventional SI physics it is introduced through the vacuum electric permittivity, , which makes it appear as a quantity derived from another electromagnetic constant. Measurement Quantization (MQ) approaches the problem from a different direction. It begins with the fundamental measures of length, mass, and time and the discrete count structure from which observable quantities are constructed, then asks whether Coulomb's constant can be obtained without using the electric constant or Coulomb's constant itself as an input.
The construction proceeds through a linked electromagnetic sequence. The discrete interaction count establishes the realization structure; the fine-structure constant fixes the electromagnetic mapping; elementary charge is then constructed; the vacuum electric permittivity follows; and the same count geometry finally yields Coulomb's constant. The purpose of the sequence is not to replace the SI relation above, but to expose a common first-principles structure beneath the electromagnetic constants.
Determining the Electromagnetic Interaction Count
The first step is the discrete count associated with electromagnetic realization. Let denote the electromagnetic count difference, the MQ mapping parameter, and the floor of . The count relation is
Realized measurements are not represented only by whole-number counts. MQ therefore introduces the metric differential, a normalization associated with the transition from the discrete Internal Frame description to the observable System Frame. Let be the length count and the corresponding length-count differential. Their relation is
The count structure and the realized laboratory quantity are not treated as identical descriptions. The metric differential supplies the count-dependent normalization required by the Frames mapping. This distinction recurs throughout the electromagnetic derivation and is why the same fundamental measures can participate in several realized constants without those constants being inserted independently.
Recovering the Fine-Structure Constant
The fine-structure constant provides a stringent electromagnetic consistency condition. MQ distinguishes fundamental, Planck-like, and classically realized inverse forms. Let , , and denote these three forms, respectively. The fundamental form is , while application of the count offset gives .
The classically realized form then incorporates the length-count differential:
This progression illustrates a central feature of MQ. The observed constant is reached through successive transformations of a discrete count relation rather than introduced as an independent empirical parameter. The comparison with the 2022 CODATA recommended value is therefore best interpreted in light of the input dependencies used to establish the fundamental measures.
Constructing Elementary Charge
Once the electromagnetic count structure has been established, MQ proceeds to elementary charge. Let denote the fundamental length, the fundamental time, the fundamental mass, and the defined speed of light. The fundamental charge form is
Let denote the electromagnetic realization count, the Planck-like elementary charge, and the classically realized elementary charge. The discrete realization uses , after which the Planck-like charge is obtained from the charge-count realization polynomial.
The Informativity differential then supplies the contraction between the Planck-like and classical forms. If denotes that difference, then and . Consequently,
The fine-structure construction applies its count offset additively, whereas elementary charge incorporates the offset through a quotient before the Informativity differential is applied. The algebra therefore looks different even though both derivations implement the same underlying distinction between discrete count structure and its realized System Frame value.
Deriving the Vacuum Electric Permittivity
Elementary charge can then be inserted into the electromagnetic relation for the electric constant. Let denote the vacuum electric permittivity and the dimensionless Frames mapping geometry factor. After the count-dependent terms are collected into , the result reduces to
In this construction the electric constant is not the starting point for Coulomb's constant. It is an intermediate consequence of the fundamental measures and the electromagnetic realization geometry. This reverses the conventional explanatory order while preserving the established SI relationship among the constants.
Applying the Frames Mapping
The count geometry is collected into the dimensionless factor . It combines the electromagnetic count offset, the length-count differential, the elementary-charge remainder, and the realization polynomial. In this way the Frames mapping separates frame-dependent realization geometry from the fundamental measures that enter the physical expression.
The role of is organizational. It collects the already specified realization terms into one dimensionless factor. Once the mapping parameter and the relevant count relations are fixed, the geometry follows from the same MQ construction used for the preceding electromagnetic quantities.
Deriving Coulomb's Constant
Let denote Coulomb's constant. Substitution of the MQ electric-constant expression into the conventional relation eliminates the electric constant from the final first-principles form:
The expression depends on the MQ fundamental measures and the Frames mapping geometry factor rather than on vacuum permittivity as an independent input. In the present implementation, the source quantities used to establish the fundamental measures ultimately trace to the 2022 CODATA adjustment and defined SI constants. The numerical agreement with the CODATA value should therefore be read as a concordance and structural-consistency result, not automatically as an independent experimental prediction.
This dependency distinction is important because the elementary charge and speed of light are exact defining constants in the present SI, while the electric and magnetic constants and Coulomb's constant are linked to the experimentally determined fine-structure constant. A calculation that uses one member of this algebraically connected network to fix the realization geometry and then reproduces another member demonstrates consistency of the MQ construction with the electromagnetic constant network. A statistically independent test requires a source measurement whose determination does not already fix the comparison quantity through the same SI/CODATA dependencies.
The central result is the change in explanatory order. Conventional SI writes Coulomb's constant through vacuum permittivity. MQ instead resolves the electromagnetic count geometry and fundamental measures first, derives the intermediate electromagnetic quantities, and arrives at in a form containing , , , and . The conventional relation is preserved, but vacuum permittivity is no longer the conceptual starting point.
8: Resolving the Hubble tension 68.261 and 73.510 km s Mpc
International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics
7: Measurement Quantization
Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology
6: Physically Significant Units of Measure
5: Measurement Quantization Unites Classical and Quantum Physics
4: Quantum Model of Gravity Unifies Relativistic Effects, Describes Inflation/Expansion Transition, Matches CMB Data
3: Measurement Quantization Accounts for Galactic Rotational Velocities and Obviates Dark Matter
2: Measurement Quantization Describes History of Universe -
Quantum Inflation, Transition to Expansion, CMB Power Spectrum
International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
1: Measurement Quantization Describes the Physical Constants
