—————————— read pre-print on research gate (new window) ——————————

There are no inputs needed to resolve this expression.

• l_f, m_f and t_f are the fundamental measures, more precise expressions for Planck’s units – length, mass, and time – that consider the effects of length contraction associated with discrete measure.
• θ_si can be measured as the polarization angle of quantum entangled X-rays at the degenerate frequency of a maximal Bell state. As an angle θ_si=3.26239 rad ± 2 μrad; as a momentum θ_si=3.26239030392(48) kg m s^-1 and with respect to the Target Frame, θ_si has no units. The relation of angle and mass is mathematically demonstrated, as well, by No-Ping Chen, et. al.
• G is the gravitational constant, 6.6740779428(56) 10^-11m³kg^-1s^-2 such that its value considers the effects of length contraction associated with discrete measure at the upper count limit. Italicized G identifies a measure not at the limit (e.g., G=6.6738448362(53) 10^-11m³kg^-1s^-2 at the blackbody demarcation).
• c is the speed of light which may also be written as c=n_Ll_f/n_Tt_f=299,792,458 m/s such that n_L=n_T=1 is physically significant.
• Q_L is the fractional portion of a count of l_f when engaging in a more precise calculation.
• ħ is the reduced Planck constant, 1.054571817 10^-34 m² kg s^-1. When accounting for the Informativity differential at the upper count bound, this term is not italicized (i.e., ħ=1.0545349844(45) ^-34 m² kg s^-1).

Mohr, P., Taylor, B., and Newell, D.: CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010, p. 3, (2012), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1527.

The expression which describes both Newton’s constant for gravitation and the reduced Planck constant is 4Gθ_si²=ħc³. The expression is important to the development of Measurement Quantization (MQ). Early research regarding a new form of measurement distortion — not related to those relativistic effects described by Einstein — demonstrated a distance sensitive variation in the values of G and ħ. The effect was eventually identified as length contraction, a physically significant consequence of discrete measure. Had the lower bounds of measure described by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle served only to describe physical limits to measure, the effect would not exist. But, further research demonstrated that each of the three measures were physically discrete and countable and where dimensions are two or greater, there will also be a contraction of that measure.

Also of note, an MQ presentation of the uncertainty principle revealed that each dimension carries a reference measure. The effect is supported to six digits with respect to experiments in: optics, quantum mechanics, classical physics and cosmology. The phenomenon of length contraction was eventually identified with the term, the Informativity differential. It may be expressed as

Resolving the Informativity differential with respect to the measures of G and/or ħ resolves several issues, most notable being the Constant's Tension regarding the value of each as published in the last three editions of the CODATA.

That is, where G is measured macroscopically, the Informativity differential becomes measurable only where G is used to describe phenomena quantum in nature. Where ħ is measured with respect to quantum phenomena, the Informativity differential is measurable only where ħ is used to describe phenomena that are macroscopic. The reason is straight-forward.

G is measured macroscopically whereas ħ is measured quantumly, with respect to blackbody radiation. When the two terms are mixed, as in Planck's unit expressions, we can no longer solve for component terms with an accuracy greater than four significant digits. For instance, if we take each of Planck's expressions and solve for G using c and ħ - both which are defined or measured to nine or more digits - we discover that all solutions to G differ in the fifth digit. It follows, either Planck's expressions do not account for new physics, the expressions are wrong, or our measures of c and ħ are not correct.

We present that measure in the local frame is discrete and as such, there is always a fractional count n_L of l_f lost with each increment in elapsed time t_f. Accounting for the Informativity differential in combination with the MQ resolved values for the fundamental measures resolves the calculation discrepancy.

As a historical footnote, a closer look at the resolved values for G, would reveal that the midpoint between the 2010 and 2018 values is equal to the 2014 value. The observation reveals the geometry.

Thus, recognizing the importance of the Informativity differential, we use the distance adjusted value for ħ to properly balance the calculation. That is, a macroscopic value for ħ adjusted for the Informativity differential is

In MQ vanacular we refer to this value as the Reduced Fundamental Constant, ħ, not italicized when resolved with respect to the upper count bound. As the reduced Planck constant is used in many expressions describing macroscopic phenomena, to account for the Informativity differential calculated measures must consider a shared frame of reference; either all terms as measured at the upper count bound or at the electromagnetic demarcation.

Notably, I have italicized G and ħ as is consistently indicated for a variable. I do not italicize the speed of light c. The reason for this change in nomenclature is because G and ħ vary in measure as a function of the Informativity differential. In contrast, the speed of light does not.

Lastly, because Q_L is a more difficult mathematical term to work with, the Informativity differential is almost always taken at the upper count bound Q_Ln_Lr=1/2. This is valid to six significant digits for any phenomenon in excess of 2,247 l_f from a center of mass.

It should also be noted that there has been a change in the nomenclature from earlier papers. To clarify, the following terms are one and the same: Q_Lf=Q_L and r_Lf=n_Lr. The term to the right of each equality is the preferred nomenclature today.